<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 16 Gorgeous Web Safe Fonts To Use With CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-300314</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-300314</guid>
		<description>Thanksw so much, especially to all those that left comments.  I&#039;m a true newbie to css and appreciate hearing from the vets.  I&#039;ll take any tips I can get.  Now, are you sure I can&#039;t do my entire site in Comic sans?
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanksw so much, especially to all those that left comments.  I&#8217;m a true newbie to css and appreciate hearing from the vets.  I&#8217;ll take any tips I can get.  Now, are you sure I can&#8217;t do my entire site in Comic sans?<br />
 <img src='http://www.webdesigndev.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jai Catalano</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-297617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jai Catalano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-297617</guid>
		<description>What font are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What font are you using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satriyo</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-292779</link>
		<dc:creator>Satriyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-292779</guid>
		<description>Usefull for me, thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usefull for me, thanks <img src='http://www.webdesigndev.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-265288</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 13:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-265288</guid>
		<description>Nice article! The thing is that some of these font work only on mac, others only on PC... there should be a 100% cross-platform and cross-browser way to implement these fonts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article! The thing is that some of these font work only on mac, others only on PC&#8230; there should be a 100% cross-platform and cross-browser way to implement these fonts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matej Latin</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-253044</link>
		<dc:creator>Matej Latin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-253044</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this collection.. now I can use these as a replacement for some similar fonts tha I&#039;d have to import using the font-face. Reducing the website size in kb is always a good idea :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this collection.. now I can use these as a replacement for some similar fonts tha I&#8217;d have to import using the font-face. Reducing the website size in kb is always a good idea <img src='http://www.webdesigndev.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-247886</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-247886</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great selection of fonts. I was having trouble making up my mind on which one to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great selection of fonts. I was having trouble making up my mind on which one to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-246517</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-246517</guid>
		<description>Some great fonts, thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great fonts, thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-218666</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-218666</guid>
		<description>Hi Ron
&quot;web safe&quot; refers to fonts that can be used on all platforms.
I had a go but @font-face doesnt work for all browsers and all platforms. Wish it did though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ron<br />
&#8220;web safe&#8221; refers to fonts that can be used on all platforms.<br />
I had a go but @font-face doesnt work for all browsers and all platforms. Wish it did though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Baum</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-204541</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Baum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 02:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-204541</guid>
		<description>A few of the fonts in this post get their web-safe cred by being included with Office applications, so it&#039;s a better-than-even shot that a given user has installed them either by not paying attention in the course of the Office install or by paying attention and opting for the fonts. So whether a given typeface is web-safe or not depends on whether the audience segment in the aggregate likely installed the fonts with Office.

So then the question is: where are you going to use a half-web-safe font?

I think for the back of the stack you want truly web-safe fonts. For the front of the stack, why bother with these when you&#039;ve got @font-face? Those give us TRULY gorgeous type.

Fifteen years was a very long time with the six or seven web-safe faces (Comic Sans does NOT count). 

I frankly hope never to spec any of those for the front of a font stack ever again, unless they&#039;re  part of a client&#039;s actual brand. And then we&#039;ll probably use the real typeface - not the web-safe, lame substitute.

Now, again, to be clear, I&#039;m talking about the front of the stack - the place where we spec what&#039;s going to happen in modern browsers on computers that were built in the last five years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few of the fonts in this post get their web-safe cred by being included with Office applications, so it&#8217;s a better-than-even shot that a given user has installed them either by not paying attention in the course of the Office install or by paying attention and opting for the fonts. So whether a given typeface is web-safe or not depends on whether the audience segment in the aggregate likely installed the fonts with Office.</p>
<p>So then the question is: where are you going to use a half-web-safe font?</p>
<p>I think for the back of the stack you want truly web-safe fonts. For the front of the stack, why bother with these when you&#8217;ve got @font-face? Those give us TRULY gorgeous type.</p>
<p>Fifteen years was a very long time with the six or seven web-safe faces (Comic Sans does NOT count). </p>
<p>I frankly hope never to spec any of those for the front of a font stack ever again, unless they&#8217;re  part of a client&#8217;s actual brand. And then we&#8217;ll probably use the real typeface &#8211; not the web-safe, lame substitute.</p>
<p>Now, again, to be clear, I&#8217;m talking about the front of the stack &#8211; the place where we spec what&#8217;s going to happen in modern browsers on computers that were built in the last five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petr Chutný</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigndev.com/web-development/16-gorgeous-web-safe-fonts-to-use-with-css/comment-page-3#comment-197132</link>
		<dc:creator>Petr Chutný</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigndev.com/?p=1886#comment-197132</guid>
		<description>This is very handy, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very handy, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 560/572 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.webdesigndev.com @ 2012-02-13 02:44:07 -->
